The graph shows the Lift Coefficient

Image originally from the German Aerospace Centre (DLR - Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt) but available on the Wikipedia page for Stall and Flow Separation and licensed by DLR under a Creative Commons By Attribution License 3.0
Notice where the stall starts on the wing surface!

A stall is not about airspeed.
A stall occurs when the angle of attack (AoA) exceeds the critical angle of attack — the point at which the smooth airflow over the wing separates, and lift collapses.
A wing can stall at any airspeed — even at cruise speed if the AoA is high enough (e.g. a steep turn with back pressure).

As AoA increases beyond the critical angle:
The result: rapid loss of lift, combined with a pitch-down tendency — with the centre of pressure now behind the centre of gravity, what lift remains pitches the nose down.
The best way to handle a stall is to not enter one in the first place.
Situations that increase the angle of attack and therefore increase stall risk:
Always maintain awareness of airspeed and pitch attitude together. Neither alone is enough.
Other situations that can also increase the risk of stalling:
Uncoordinated flight is particularly dangerous near the stall:
![]()
Read the Bold Method article "Why skids are more dangerous than slips" for more detail about why a skidding (adding too much inside rudder for the turn) during slow flight is dangerous when low.
Keep the balance ball centred. At slow speeds, every input matters.
As we fly slower to maintain lift, we must increase AoA. This creates:
The aircraft is working harder for less result — we are "behind the power curve."
As we approach the stall, the aeroplane provides several warnings:
The imminent stall is the moment to act — recovery is easiest here, with minimum height loss.
Control surfaces work by deflecting airflow. As airspeed decreases:
This is the beginning of the degradation that leads to the stall.
This is why you feel the controls before you experience the full stall — the controls are telling you something important.

Most training aircraft have an automatic stall warning device — typically a horn or buzzer:
The warning horn is your cue to act immediately.
Do not wait for the full stall to develop. The moment the horn sounds, reduce AoA.
Image licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0 Frank Murrman
If the imminent stall warnings are ignored, the full stall develops:
The fully developed stall requires prompt recovery action — especially at low altitude.
What we covered:
| Topic | Key point |
|---|---|
| Stall aerodynamics | When does a stall occur? Why? |
| Stall avoidance | What types of flight can we avoid to avoid stalls? |
| Imminent stall symptoms | What are the symptoms of an imminent stall |
| Fully developed stall | What are the effects of a fully developed stall |
What we covered:
| Topic | Key point |
|---|---|
| Stall aerodynamics | A stall occurs when AoA exceeds the critical angle — not necessarily when airspeed is "too low" (though that is the most common scenario) |
| Stall avoidance | Slow flight, steep turns, uncoordinated flight all increase stall risk |
| Imminent stall symptoms | Low speed, high nose, control effectiveness, buffet, stall horn — act immediately |
| Fully developed stall | Lift collapses, nose drops, possible wing drop — requires prompt recovery |
Can you:
Any questions before we move on to Part 2?
Part 2 covers: stall recovery technique, effect of power and flap, factors affecting stall speed, instrument indications, and the HASELL check.
This first theory session covers the aerodynamics of slow flight and stalling, how and why a stall happens, and how to recognise an impending stall. Part 2 covers recovery techniques, factors affecting stall speed, instrument indications, and the HASELL check. Together these prepare the student for what they will experience in the air.
Most people have stalled cars either at traffic lights or on a steep hill. The key points are that the engine doesn't have enough power to continue producing the force required to move forwards.
- We're used to stalling in a car - when the car doesn't have enough power to continue climbing a hill (until we change gears or apply more power). - Set 38% throttle for best stall. - How is a stall different for an aeroplane?
- This is where our analogy breaks down: it's quite different. - First, in a car, it's about not having enough force available to keep moving you forward (whether at the lights or on a hill), whereas in an aeroplane it's about not having enough force to hold you up in the air. - Second, in an aeroplane it's not necessarily related to power - you can stall a plane both when you're going slow or fast.
Part 1 builds the foundation: what a stall actually is aerodynamically, why it matters, how control effectiveness degrades before the stall, and the symptoms that warn us it's coming. Part 2 covers recovery and the factors that change stall speed.
Click Direct-To to advance to Stall Aerodynamics.
- Briefly review that the Lift force is just one of the four forces, balancing the weight. - The lift is split into the vertical component of lift and the horizontal component of lift when banking. **Worth a side note here: where those two arrows act.** Follow the grey lines through the lift and weight arrows. Weight acts at the **centre of gravity**; lift acts at the **centre of pressure** — the point through which all the pressure differences over the wing add up. The two are not in the same place, so lift and weight form a **couple**, and a second couple between thrust and drag opposes it. **Which way each couple acts depends on the aeroplane** — be careful not to teach the model's arrangement as a universal rule: - The **biplane in this model** has its centre of pressure a little **forward** of the centre of gravity, so its lift/weight couple is **nose-up**, opposed by a nose-down thrust/drag couple (the thrust line sits above the drag line of the wing cell and its rigging). - **Most conventional trainers are the other way round**, and this is the arrangement the textbooks draw: the centre of pressure sits **behind** the centre of gravity, giving a **nose-down** lift/weight couple, balanced by a **download on the tailplane** and by a nose-up thrust/drag couple. It is deliberate — lose the engine and the nose drops rather than rises, so the aeroplane keeps flying speed by itself. The arrows show *where* the forces act, not a pitching simulation — the model has no moment dynamics behind it. **What matters for stalling is the same either way.** As the airflow separates, the suction peak near the leading edge collapses, so the centre of pressure **moves rearward**. Wherever it started, it ends up further behind the centre of gravity, so the lift/weight moment shifts **nose-down**. The nose drops on its own, the angle of attack reduces, and the wing starts flying again — the self-recovery tendency most training aircraft are designed to have. Two consequences to draw out (they return in Part 2's table of factors affecting stall speed): - A **forward** centre of gravity gives a longer arm to that nose-down moment, so the nose drops more decisively — the stall is more pronounced but recovery is easier. It also means the tailplane must hold more download, so the wing carries more than just the weight and the stall speed rises. - An **aft** centre of gravity leaves the centre of pressure much less room to move behind, so the nose-down tendency is weak. The stall is gentler in feel but **recovery is harder** — one of the reasons the loading limits matter. If it helps, sketch it rather than relying on the model: a fulcrum at the CoG, the lift arrow near it, then slide the lift arrow well behind it as the wing stalls.
Use a physical aeroplane model to show, or have the student show, what happens as we increase back pressure or decrease back pressure. As the elevator changes, the angle of attack of the wing, the main lifting surface is changed.
There is no need to drill the algebra here — the point is that the formula holds no surprises. It is the same four factors the student reasoned out for themselves with a hand out the car window in Lesson 2, now with names attached. Work the level-flight argument through on the board, because it is the whole lesson in one line: lift has to equal weight, so flying slower forces a higher angle of attack. Keep slowing, and eventually the angle of attack needed to hold you up is more than the wing can give — that is the stall. **Where flap fits, if it comes up.** $S$ is a fixed reference area — it is a property of the aeroplane, not something the pilot changes, so treat it as a constant. Lowering flap increases the wing's **camber**, which raises $C_{L}$ at any given angle of attack; that is why flap lowers the stall speed. Some types (Fowler and semi-Fowler flaps) do also slide the flap rearward and add a little real area, but $S$ in the formula stays the fixed reference value, so even that shows up as a change in $C_{L}$. Everything flap does, it does through $C_{L}$. The punchline to land: **only $C_{L}$ has a ceiling.** Density, speed and area will keep giving you more lift for more of them, but $C_{L}$ stops climbing at the critical angle and then falls away. That is why we define the stall by angle of attack and not by a speed. Everything in the "factors affecting stall speed" table in Part 2 is this same equation rearranged. If a student wants it explicitly, the stall speed falls out as $V_{S} = \sqrt{2W / (\rho\,S\,C_{L_{max}})}$ — heavier or thinner air raises it; more wing area, or flap, lowers it. Offer that only if they ask for it.
Note the spirals of air, with some air going backwards - we'll see more of this later. - When this angle between the surrounding airflow and the wing passes a critical angle (around 16 degrees), the air breaks away from the wing as we'll see soon. - It's a good thing that aeroplanes are designed to pitch forward when they stall - it doesn't have to be that way, but it's designed in to help in a stall Lead in: But what does that look like outside of a wind tunnel? Is it something we can see? With some help of wool, yes!
One of the best *real* visualisations I've found for what's actually happening in a stall is achieved by taping pieces of cotten or wool to the wing of an aircraft.
The key misconception to address is that "stalling = going too slow." While slow speed is the most common trigger, the stall is always caused by exceeding the critical angle of attack. This is fundamental — return to it throughout the lesson.
Refer back to the four forces side note: lift acts at the centre of pressure, weight at the centre of gravity, and in normal flight the two sit close together — which side of the other varies with the type. As the wing stalls the centre of pressure moves aft, so wherever it started it ends up well behind the centre of gravity and the lift/weight moment becomes strongly nose-down. The pitch-down tendency is a useful natural self-recovery tendency in most light aircraft — the nose drops, AoA reduces, airflow reattaches, and lift returns. The danger is when we instinctively pull back to "stop the nose dropping."
Click Direct-To to advance to Stall Avoidance.
You might notice that pulling back on the controls and slow flight are risks that we're exposed to both during take-off and landing. There are videos on the internet showing stalls on take-off due to these two factors, such as: - https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4Px1f3ukBpo but I removed the slide with that from the deck since it's quite confronting for the first stalls lesson. Feedback was maybe introduce those for advanced stalling. Leaving the link here in the presenter notes in case. The only real problem in this video and many others like it, is that it happens so close to the ground. It's easy to recover from if you have sufficient height, but low to the ground you don't have that option. That's why the **H**eight, for sufficient height, is the first item is our **HASELL** check.
In what stage of a flight might you find yourself pulling back on the controls, slowing the aeroplane down and possibly turning steeply? The turning stall and base-to-final stall (with a low, slow, uncoordinated turn) is a leading cause of fatal general aviation accidents. Plant the seed now — we will explore this more in Lesson 16 (Advanced Stalling).
This connects to the secondary effects covered in Lesson 1 — rudder-alone use causes roll; aileron-alone causes slip. Combining them incorrectly near the stall is dangerous.
Keep this brief — induced drag is covered in the aerodynamics theory. The key takeaway is: at slow speed, you need more power to stay level, not less.
The power required as you slow down isn't shown so dramatically here, but it can still be seen: At the minimum power required, around V_x, as we slow down further, *more* power is required.
Click Direct-To to advance to Recognising the Stall.
We will practise recognising the imminent stall in the air and recovering the moment the warning sounds, before the full stall develops. This is the preferred recovery technique.
To see buffetting, use full power and 15 or 16 AoA 17 and 17.5 show lift dropping to nothing, but 18 collapses the simulation at full power.
Relate this to the hand-out-the-window analogy: at slow speed, very little force on the hand. The student will feel this in the air today.
The stall warning vane works by detecting the angle at which air is flowing into the leading edge. As AoA increases, the stagnation point moves down toward the lower leading edge, causing the vane to deflect and trigger the warning. Some aircraft use a heated pitot-type sensor instead.
Emphasise: in a fully developed stall, the instinct to pull back makes things worse. The control column must move forward to reduce AoA. This is counter-intuitive for new students and must be reinforced.
Click Direct-To to advance to the recap.